FAISON v. COURIEL et al

Read more on govinfo.gov

Plaintiffs:

Defendants:

2023-02-03: aintiff's claims are DISMISSED without prejudice under the three-strikes provision of 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g) because Plaintiff did not pay the filing fee at the time he initiated this case, fails to meet the imminent danger exception, and fails to state a claim." Plaintiff's motions, ECF Nos. 6 & 9, are DENIED as moot. The Clerk shall close the file. Signed by CHIEF JUDGE MARK E WALKER on 2/3/23. (sjb) Modified on 2/8/2023 (sjb).ORDER ACCEPTING AND ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION, DENYING REMAINING MOTIONS - The report and recommendation, ECF No. 3, is accepted and adopted as this Court's opinion. The Clerk shall enter judgment stating, "Pl

2023-01-20: *** VACATED PER 8 ORDER***ORDER ACCEPTING AND ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION - The report and recommendation, ECF No. 3, is accepted and adopted as this Court's opinion. The Clerk shall enter judgment stating, "Pfails to state a claim." The Clerk shall close the file. Signed by CHIEF JUDGE MARK E WALKER on 1/20/23. (sjb) Modified on 1/27/2023 (sjb).laintiff's claims are DISMISSED without prejudice under the three-strikes provision of 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g) because Plaintiff did not pay the filing fee at the time he initiated this case, fails to meet the imminent danger exception, and

2022-12-22: ge if objections are not filed earlier: 1/19/2023. R&R flag set.) (tpm) Modified on 1/27/2023 (sjb).REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION: It is respectfully RECOMMENDED that the case be DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE under the three-strikes provision of 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g) because Plaintiff did not pay the filing fee at the time he initiated this case, fails to meet the imminent danger exception, and fails to state a claim. It is further RECOMMENDED that the case be CLOSED. Signed by MAGISTRATE JUDGE MARTIN A FITZPATRICK on 12/22/2022. (Internal deadline for referral to district jud