Ensley v. Foster et al

Read more on govinfo.gov

Plaintiffs:

Ensley, Mark

Defendants:

Foster, Michelle

Goyeneche, Rafael

New Orleans Metropolitan Crime Commission,

2023-02-01: Judge Wendy B Vitter on 2/1/23.(cg)ORDER AND REASONS: The Court, having considered Plaintiff Mark Ensley's 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Complaint, 4 the record, the applicable law, the Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge,2 and the failure of the Plaintiff to file any objection to the Report and Recommendation, hereby approves the Report and Recommendation and adopts it as its opinion in this matter. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiff's 42 U.S.C. § 1983 claims alleged in the Complaint against Defendants, Michelle Foster, New Orleans Metropolitan Crime Commission, and Rafael Goyeneche, III, are DISMISSED, without prejudice, for lack of subject-matter jurisdiction, for the reasons stated in the Report and Recommendation. Signed by

2022-12-28: REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS re 4 Complaint filed by Mark H. Ensley. It is therefore RECOMMENDED that plaintiffs complaint be DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE for lack of subject-matter jurisdiction. Objections to R&R due by 1/11/2023. Signed by Magistrate Judge Janis van Meerveld on 12/28/2022. (NEF: Sect. D) (rt)