Rieves v. Smyrna, Town of et al

United States District Court Middle District of Tennessee
Case #: 3:18-cv-00965
Circuit: 6th
Cause: 42:1983 Civil Rights Act

Read more on govinfo.gov

Plaintiffs:

Angly, Samy

Ayoob

Berbert, Louis

Bishara, Akram

Eskander

Hanna, George

Malaty, Ehab

Mankarious, Alaa

Mansour, Neven

Marcous, Micheal

Mikhail, Mena

Rieves, James

Ritter, Gina

Ritter, Scott

Sublett, Frederick

Tadrous, Marian

Zakaria, Michael

Defendants:

Arnold, Kevin

Fitzhugh, Mike

Jones, Jennings

Rutherford County, Tennessee,

Smyrna, Town of,

Zimmerman, John

2022-01-12: TTORNEYS MUST OPEN THE PDF AND READ THE ORDER.)(hb)MEMORANDUM AND ORDER: The court finds that the Plott factors, considered together, do not weigh in favor of granting the plaintiff a delay until the conclusion of all discovery to respond to the County Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment. The Motion to Defer (Doc. No. 113), therefore, is DENIED. This denial, however, is without prejudice to the plaintiff's ability to renew the motion if, in responding to the Motion for Summary Judgment, he finds that he is in need of specific discovery that he has not yet had the opportunity to take in order to respond to the defendants' motion. Otherwise, the plaintiff SHALL respond to the County Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment by or before February 2, 2022. The County Defendants may file a Reply (which shall not exceed five pages) within fourteen days after the filing of the Response. It is so ORDERED. Signed by District Judge Aleta A. Trauger on 1/12/2022. (DOCKET TEXT SUMMARY ONLY-A